![]() ![]() Here's how Justice Souter described the rule when giving his opinion to the court: It was a Supreme Court case that revolved around copyright rules and peer-to-peer file-sharing.ĭuring the landmark case, the court developed the " inducement rule". It all comes back to the court case of MGM Studios, Inc. ![]() Is a company legally at fault if it merely provides a way for users to access illegal content, even if it does not host or distribute any of the material itself? ![]() Napster, Limewire, The Pirate Bay, Project Free TV, and Megaupload are all prime examples of this issue. But what about the add-on itself? What about the legality of the actual software? The situation regarding the legality of the content on Kodi Exodus is fairly clear cut.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |